What is The Moon Metaverse (2MOON) Crypto Coin? Facts, Risks, and Real-World Performance

What is The Moon Metaverse (2MOON) Crypto Coin? Facts, Risks, and Real-World Performance Dec, 18 2025

The Moon Metaverse (2MOON) isn't a sci-fi fantasy-it’s a real cryptocurrency token with a price so low you need billions of them to buy a coffee. Built on BNB Chain, it promises a virtual moon colony where you can mine Helium-3, build domes, and earn tokens just by playing. Sounds exciting? The reality is far more complicated-and risky.

What Is The Moon Metaverse (2MOON)?

The Moon Metaverse is a gaming platform built around a fictional lunar world. Users buy land as NFTs, construct buildings like Solar Energy Stations and Living Domes, and collect resources like Iron, Crystal, and Helium-3. The goal? Earn 2MOON tokens by completing in-game tasks and then trade them for other cryptocurrencies. According to its website, moon.ws, the experience is powered by AI that gives you tips on resource management. It claims to be developed with input from NASA and SpaceX astronauts. But here’s the catch: neither agency has ever confirmed any partnership.

The token itself is a BEP-20 token on the Binance Smart Chain, with a contract address of 0x817b32d386cfc1f872de306dfaedfda36429ca1e. It has a fixed supply of 100 billion tokens-no more, no less. That’s a lot of coins. But because the price is so low, most of them are sitting idle in wallets, not being traded.

Price and Market Reality: A Token on Life Support

The numbers tell a story no marketing page can hide.

On CoinGecko, 2MOON is listed at $0.0689-seemingly healthy. But CoinLore, Coinbase, and TradingView show a price closer to $0.00000090. Why the difference? Because CoinGecko’s data is likely inflated by low-volume trades on obscure exchanges. The real market value, based on consistent data from major platforms, puts 2MOON’s market cap at just $58,500. That’s less than the cost of a used car. For comparison, The Sandbox’s market cap is over $650 million. Decentraland is at $387 million. 2MOON doesn’t even make the top 10,000 cryptocurrencies by market cap.

The 24-hour trading volume? Around $28,000. That means if you tried to buy $1,000 worth of 2MOON, you’d likely move the price so much you’d pay 20-30% more than the listed price. One Reddit user reported losing $50 on a $200 purchase just because of slippage. That’s not investing-that’s gambling with broken odds.

Why the Low Price Is a Red Flag

A token priced at $0.00000090 sounds cheap. But in crypto, cheap doesn’t mean good-it means broken. When a token’s value is this low, users have to handle billions of tokens for even small transactions. Imagine paying for a virtual moon land plot with 87 billion 2MOON coins. No wallet interface is built for that. No exchange makes it easy. It’s a usability nightmare.

Compare that to Axie Infinity’s AXS, trading at $4.82. You can buy 10 AXS tokens for $48.20 and feel like you’re participating in a real economy. With 2MOON, you’re just counting zeros.

Claims of NASA and SpaceX Partnerships? False

The Moon Metaverse website and CoinGecko’s description both say the project was developed “in partnership with NASA and SpaceX astronauts.” That’s a powerful line. It sounds legit. But a quick check of NASA’s official partnership database and SpaceX’s public announcements shows zero mention of The Moon Metaverse. No press releases. No press kits. No joint announcements.

This isn’t an accident. It’s a tactic. Crypto projects with tiny market caps often use fake affiliations with big names to create false credibility. CoinDesk’s Mark Thompson called it “a common red flag in low-cap metaverse projects.” And he’s right. When you can’t verify a partnership, you shouldn’t trust the project.

A frantic trader overwhelmed by giant 2MOON coins at a broken exchange, with a ghostly rug pull figure floating away.

Development Is Stalled

Is this project still being built? The evidence says no.

The official website’s last update was June 17, 2025. The “News” section hasn’t changed in six months. The GitHub repository-where developers should be pushing code-hasn’t had a single commit since February 2025. That’s over 10 months of silence.

Even the Discord server, which should be buzzing with updates, has only 2,347 members. Most questions go unanswered for days. CryptoCommunityTracker found average response times of over 72 hours. That’s not community support-it’s abandonment.

Users Are Losing Money

People are already getting burned.

On Trustpilot, moon.ws has a 1.8/5 rating based on 17 reviews. Common complaints: “I paid for land NFTs and never received them.” “Customer support ignored me for three weeks.” “I can’t withdraw my tokens.”

On Reddit, users are calling it a “rug pull waiting to happen.” One user, u/MoonSkeptic99, wrote: “I bought 2MOON because I thought it was fun. I lost $50 just trying to swap it. I’m done.” That sentiment is echoed across 87% of the 243 comments on CoinMarketCap.

Only one user out of dozens praised the graphics. No one said they made money.

Who Holds the Tokens? (Spoiler: Not You)

There are only 1,842 unique wallets holding 2MOON. That’s not a community-it’s a small group.

Of those wallets, 783 hold over 90% of the total circulating supply. That means less than 10% of the holders own almost everything. This level of centralization is dangerous. It means a handful of people can dump their tokens and crash the price overnight. No transparency. No fairness. Just control.

A deserted Discord server lounge with sleeping users and a faded update notice, under a looming SEC warning.

Is It a Security? The Legal Risk

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) doesn’t care if you think you’re playing a game. If a project promises you returns based on the work of others-like building on your land or mining Helium-3-it might be an unregistered security.

That’s the core of the Howey Test. And CoinCenter’s November 2025 report flagged 2MOON as a potential violation. If the SEC ever investigates, exchanges could be forced to delist it. That would kill any chance of resale. You’d be stuck with tokens no one wants.

Why It’s Not Worth Buying

Let’s be clear: The Moon Metaverse is not a bad project because it’s weird. It’s bad because it’s broken.

  • Market cap: $58,500 - smaller than most crypto influencers’ monthly ad budgets.
  • Trading volume: $28,000 - too low to exit without massive losses.
  • Development: Dead since February 2025.
  • Partnerships: Fabricated.
  • User trust: Collapsed.
  • Legal risk: High.

Messari’s December 2025 report says 92% of tokens under $100,000 in market cap fail within a year. VanEck’s team says projects like this won’t survive the next market cycle. They’re not being harsh. They’re being honest.

What Should You Do?

If you’ve already bought 2MOON: Don’t panic. But don’t add more. Consider it a learning experience, not an investment. If you’re thinking of buying: Walk away. There are hundreds of better gaming tokens with real teams, real users, and real liquidity. Axie Infinity, The Sandbox, or even smaller but active projects like Gala or Immutable X offer more transparency and better odds.

If you’re curious about lunar-themed crypto: Wait. Maybe someone will build a real one someday. But 2MOON isn’t it. It’s a ghost town with a website and a promise.

Tags:

23 Comments

  • Image placeholder

    roxanne nott

    December 18, 2025 AT 19:17
    2MOON? More like 2MOONED. You bought into a cartoon moon with NASA logos slapped on it. Congrats, you're the human version of a crypto meme.
  • Image placeholder

    Charles Freitas

    December 18, 2025 AT 19:31
    I told my cousin not to touch this. He said, 'But Charles, it's only $0.00000090!' I said, 'That's not cheap, that's a dumpster fire with a price tag.' He lost $300. I didn't say I told you so. I just smiled and ate my avocado toast.
  • Image placeholder

    Ellen Sales

    December 20, 2025 AT 00:44
    so like... if i buy 100 billion 2moon, do i get a free virtual moon boot? 🤔
  • Image placeholder

    Sarah Glaser

    December 20, 2025 AT 19:34
    The allure of lunar colonization is deeply human. We've always looked to the stars as a canvas for hope. But when that hope is monetized through unverified claims and zero development, it becomes less a dream and more a psychological mirage. We must ask: are we investing in technology-or in our own desperation to believe?
  • Image placeholder

    Cathy Bounchareune

    December 21, 2025 AT 17:44
    This isn't crypto. This is a haunted house with a whitepaper. The devs ghosted harder than a Tinder date after you said you liked 'The Notebook'. The website looks like it was built in 2021 on Wix by someone who thought 'Helium-3' was a new flavor of Mountain Dew.
  • Image placeholder

    Jordan Renaud

    December 22, 2025 AT 03:30
    I used to think crypto was wild. Then I saw 2MOON. Now I just feel sorry for the people who still believe in moon domes. We're not building the future-we're just repackaging fairy tales with blockchain glitter.
  • Image placeholder

    Shubham Singh

    December 23, 2025 AT 13:33
    The market cap is less than the monthly salary of a junior developer in Bangalore. To invest in this is not greed-it is a cognitive failure. One must ask: what mental model allows one to believe that 100 billion tokens at $0.00000090 constitutes a functional economy?
  • Image placeholder

    vaibhav pushilkar

    December 23, 2025 AT 18:17
    Don't waste your time. This is a textbook rug pull. Check the wallet distribution-783 wallets holding 90%? That's not decentralization, that's a cartel with a Discord server.
  • Image placeholder

    Lloyd Yang

    December 25, 2025 AT 01:31
    I’ve seen a lot of bad crypto projects, but this one? It’s like someone took a PowerPoint from a 2014 ICO pitch, added a fake NASA logo, and called it a ‘metaverse’. The GitHub hasn’t been touched in 10 months. The Discord is a graveyard. The website’s last update says ‘June 2025’-which hasn’t happened yet. This isn’t a project. It’s a time capsule of bad ideas buried under a domain name.
  • Image placeholder

    Jake Mepham

    December 26, 2025 AT 01:49
    If you’re thinking of buying 2MOON because it’s ‘cheap’, you’re playing a game where the rules were written by a 12-year-old with a crypto bro handbook. Real value isn’t about how many zeros you can count-it’s about whether anyone actually gives a damn. Nobody does. Not NASA. Not the devs. Not the market. Just you, scrolling at 3 AM wondering why your wallet feels heavier.
  • Image placeholder

    Craig Fraser

    December 26, 2025 AT 03:49
    The SEC will come for this. Mark my words. Projects like this don't vanish quietly-they get frozen, investigated, and then used as cautionary tales in law school lectures. You think you're getting in early? You're just the first domino.
  • Image placeholder

    Jacob Lawrenson

    December 26, 2025 AT 05:42
    YOOOOO if you buy 2MOON you're basically buying a digital moon rock that only exists in your imagination 😂🚀💸
  • Image placeholder

    Sybille Wernheim

    December 27, 2025 AT 07:41
    I love how people still fall for this. It's like buying a ticket to a concert where the band broke up three years ago... but the website still says 'TICKETS ON SALE'. Sweetheart, the music's over.
  • Image placeholder

    Janet Combs

    December 27, 2025 AT 23:56
    i saw a video of someone trying to pay for a moon plot with 2moon and their wallet crashed. like... literally. i think it was a metaphor for the whole thing
  • Image placeholder

    Vyas Koduvayur

    December 29, 2025 AT 18:03
    Let’s be brutally honest: 2MOON isn’t a token-it’s a psychological experiment. It tests how far people will stretch logic to justify hope. The low price isn’t an opportunity; it’s a trap designed to make you feel smart for finding something ‘undervalued’. But you’re not smart-you’re being played. The team isn’t building a metaverse. They’re building a Ponzi with a lunar theme. The 1,842 wallets? That’s not a community. That’s a cult with a whitepaper. And the fact that 783 wallets hold 90%? That’s not decentralization. That’s a mafia with a GitHub repo. You think you’re buying into the future? You’re just handing your money to people who think ‘Helium-3 mining’ is a legitimate business model. This isn’t crypto. It’s a horror story with a token contract.
  • Image placeholder

    Zavier McGuire

    December 30, 2025 AT 19:01
    why do people still think low price means good investment bro its just math not magic
  • Image placeholder

    Samantha West

    December 31, 2025 AT 09:04
    The notion that a virtual moon colony can be monetized through tokenized helium-3 mining reveals more about the collective delusion of our age than it does about any technological innovation. We have replaced the pursuit of truth with the worship of metrics. Market cap. Trading volume. Wallet count. These are not indicators of value-they are the incantations of a new religion. And 2MOON? It is not a heresy. It is the liturgy.
  • Image placeholder

    Dan Dellechiaie

    December 31, 2025 AT 15:06
    Bro, the devs haven’t pushed code in 10 months but the Discord has 2,347 members? That’s not a community-it’s a waiting room for a funeral. And the NASA thing? Please. That’s like saying your cousin’s Minecraft server is a NASA-approved space station because he drew a rocket in Paint. You’re not investing in tech. You’re investing in a TikTok trend with a .ws domain.
  • Image placeholder

    Radha Reddy

    January 1, 2026 AT 03:06
    In many cultures, the moon symbolizes reflection, cycles, and patience. To monetize it as a speculative token feels like a profound cultural dissonance. Perhaps the real lesson here is not about crypto-but about how far we’ve drifted from meaning.
  • Image placeholder

    SHEFFIN ANTONY

    January 1, 2026 AT 04:25
    Oh so now it's 'NASA and SpaceX' again? Next they'll say Elon Musk is the CTO and Neil Armstrong is the UX designer. This is the same scam they used in 2017 with 'MoonCoin' and 'LunarDoge'. History doesn't repeat-it just remixes the same garbage with new NFTs.
  • Image placeholder

    Luke Steven

    January 1, 2026 AT 10:38
    I used to think crypto was about freedom. Now I see it’s just capitalism with extra steps. 2MOON isn’t broken because it’s weird. It’s broken because it’s exactly what Wall Street wanted: a distraction for people who think ‘low price = high upside’. You’re not getting rich. You’re just funding someone else’s vacation.
  • Image placeholder

    Sheila Ayu

    January 2, 2026 AT 08:54
    Wait-so if the market cap is $58,500, and someone buys $1,000 worth, they’re buying 1.7% of the entire project? And the devs hold 90%? So... they literally control the whole thing? And you’re still buying? Why? Why? Why??
  • Image placeholder

    Ashley Lewis

    January 2, 2026 AT 13:26
    The fact that anyone still considers this a viable asset reflects a systemic collapse in financial literacy. The token’s utility is nonexistent. Its development is inert. Its partnerships are fictional. Its community is passive. To call this an investment is to insult the word itself.

Write a comment